Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 NE2D 690 - Byrd v. State

Byrd v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2010

8 state decisions

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on J. I. Case Co. v. Sandefur · Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc. v. FIELDS · W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. Mink · State v. Robbins · Welsh, Governor v. Sells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that Indiana's appellate courts look with disfavor upon issues that are raised by a party for the first time on appeal or in original actions without first raising the issue at first opportunity in the trial court. When the State is a party to a state court proceeding, it, like all parties, must comply with the rules then governing, and its actions, like those of all parties, are subject to scrutiny under principles of waiver and estoppel. [The State's] silence persisted until ... the State filed its motion to dismiss in' the appellate court, one day before its brief responding to appellant's brief on the merits was due. At that juncture, the trial court's belated praecipe order remained intact, the record of proceedings had been completed for use on appeal and had been. filed, and appellant's brief had been structured and prepared in final form, and duly filed. Because the State did not avail itself of these several opportunities to challenge the availability and regularity of the belated process, it was in no position to make that challenge in its motion to dismiss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[AJppellate courts look with disfavor upon issues that are raised by a party for the first time on appeal or in original actions without first raising the issue at first opportunity in the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.