Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 NE2D 740 - Wood v. State

Wood v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2016

8 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Horton v. California · Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standard for meeting the “plain view” test has traditionally required not only that the officer is in a place where he is entitled to be, but also that the discovery is. inadvertent. Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971) 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 . However, the inadvertence facet of the test ap pears to have been abrogated, at least insofar as United States Constitution Fourth Amendment considerations are involved. Horton v. California (1990) 496 U.S. 128 , 110 S.Ct. 2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 , 1 Hall, Search and Seizure § 9.5 (2d ed. 1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The bare conclusory and hearsay statement that affiant was told by Officer X that the informant had provided reliable information will not suffice for the requirement ... that the affidavit 'contain reliable information establishing the credibility of the source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.