Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 So. 2d 271 - Ford v. State

592 So. 2d 271 - Ford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1993
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maryland v. Craig · Gonzales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant's right to confront accusatory witnesses may be satisfied absent a physical, face-to-face confrontation at trial only where denial of such confrontation is necessary to further an important public policy and only where the reliability of the testimony is otherwise assured.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.