Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 So. 2d 29 - Gowdy v. State

592 So. 2d 29 - Gowdy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2011

8 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bagley · Roviaro v. United States · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 468 So. 2d 45 - Fuselier v. State · 538 So. 2d 329 - Pinkney v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here, as elsewhere in discovery, the test is not whether the party can prove the witness of whom discovery is sought would have been favorable. The whole idea behind discovery is that the discovering party ordinarily does not know how the witness will testify. The test is a different one: has the party seeking discovery shown that the witness likely has substantial knowledge relevant to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Our general discovery rule requires that, upon defense request, the prosecution disclose the names and addresses of all material witnesses. The rule extends to witnesses who may not be called at trial, where the witness may be reasonably expected to be helpful to the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The apparent purpose of the rule is twofold: to assure an adequate record for considering the issue and to give the trial judge, who is so much closer to the scene than we, every opportunity to act prior to the expensive and time-consuming process of appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.