592 So. 2d 369 - Street v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2013
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Jones v. Howard · United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · Bottoson v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The test for determining juror competency is whether the juror can lay aside any bias or prejudice and render his verdict solely upon the evidence presented and the instructions on the law given to him by the court.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[t]he denial or impairment of the right [to peremptory challenges] is reversible error without a showing of prejudice'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“were sufficiently equivocal to raise a concern that reasonable people could differ as to whether [the juror] would have been able to lay aside any biases or prejudices and render a verdict solely on the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Huber v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.