Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 SO2D 440 - State v. Barre

State v. Barre’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Boykin v. Alabama · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Automobile Exception Two requirements must be satisfied before a warrantless seizure of evidence within a movable vehicle can be authorized under this exception: (1) there must be probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime; and (2) there must be exigent circumstances requiring an immediate warrantless search. Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Lopez, 00-0562 La.10/30/00), 772 So.2d 90 ; State v. Tatum, 466 So.2d 29 (La.1985); State v. Barre, 592 So.2d 440 (La.App. 5 Cir.1991). Probable cause means”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.