McNeese v. State ex rel. Cramer’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2003
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lawley v. State · Riggs v. State Ex Rel. Jones · Davis v. State ex rel. Pettus · Hamlet v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No predicate [is] required for the introduction of the declarations of the owner [of a forfeited vehicle] tending to connect him with the illegal act. They are admissible as declarations against interest in civil actions, not as confessions in criminal prosecutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.