State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 28 Ala. App. 402 - State v. Powe · 42 Ala. App. 344 - Ex Parte Cofield · 344 So. 2d 232 - State v. Gautney · Ex Parte King · 572 So. 2d 1322 - City of Mobile v. Welch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[W]ith the exception of certain pretrial appeals . . . and habeas corpus cases, the State is not entitled to an appeal from a judgment in a criminal case in the absence of a judgment of the trial court holding the statute under which the indictment or information was preferred to be unconstitutional. State v. Gautney, 344 So.2d 232 (Ala.Crim.App. 1977); State v. Powe, 28 Ala.App. 402 , 185 So. 781 (1939); State v. Cagle, 42 Ala.App. 344 , 164 So.2d 512 (1964). See also § 12-22-91, Code of Alabama, 1975. The State is not entitled to appeal the circuit court's judgment of acquittal and discharge of the appellee.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.