Rahming v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 6, 1992

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1992-02-06

Relies on 586 So. 2d 1058 - Flowers v. State · Carter v. State · Carter v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-02-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably State v. Schopp (1995), 650 So. 2d 644 - Hervey v. Alfonso (1995)

92 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McDonald, judge.

¶1We review Rahming v. State, 579 So.2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it relied on Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quashed, 586 So.2d 340 (Fla.1991). The question presented in the instant case is whether Florida’s uniform sentencing guidelines allow legal constraint points to be assessed for each offense committed while under legal constraint. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash Rahm-ing and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Flowers.

¶2It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.