Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

592 So. 2d 784

Docket No. 91-1471.

Cochran v. State

Kenneth COCHRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 29, 1992.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-01-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1996

3 state decisions

Relies on 586 So. 2d 1058 - Flowers v. State · Carter v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-01-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The appellant's sentence, founded on an erroneously scored guideline, is reversed. Flowers v. State,586 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 1991); Carter v. State,586 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1991). We recognize that the mandated rescoring will not alter the permitted range of sentencing. Nevertheless, it cannot be assumed here that the change in score might not impact the exercise of the court's discretion.

¶5GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

/592/so2d/784 · .json · Public domain