Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 SO2D 987 - Martin v. State

Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2014

6 state decisions

40199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 468 So. 2d 45 - Fuselier v. State · 428 So. 2d 576 - Gilliard v. State · Chisolm v. State · 512 So. 2d 1246 - Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A clear showing that a juror's views would prevent or significantly impair the performance of his duties requires more than a single response to an initial inquiry.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.