Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 592 SO2D 990 - Stephens v. State

Stephens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2016

4 state decisions

20199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 478 So. 2d 1017 - Harper v. State · Ruffin v. State · 533 So. 2d 444 - Griffin v. State · 541 So. 2d 1027 - McGowan v. State · United States v. Pitts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no evidence presented that could possibly support Stephens' claim, unless the court stultified itself and took the position that the impeached testimony of (the above-mentioned witness) supported it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.