Dynamet Technology, Inc. v. Dynamet Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
593 F.2d 1007 · 1979
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2000
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1052 (§ 2 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1066 (§ 16 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (§ 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf · United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co. · American Steel Foundries v. Robertson · Lawyers Title Ins. v. Lawyers Title Ins. · Ernie M. Duff v. The Kansas City Star Company, a Corporation, and Emil A. Sees
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.