Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 F.2d 1297 - Marshall v. Local Union No. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Inc.

Marshall v. Local Union No. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

593 F.2d 1297 · 1979

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2015

6 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

9019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Aetna Life Ins Co of Hartford Conn v. Haworth · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Powell v. McCormack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, union members must exhaust internal union remedies. Then they must file a complaint with the Secretary of Labor. Section 402(a), 29 U.S.C. § 482(a). Finally, if the Secretary of Labor “finds probable cause to believe that a violation ... has occurred ... he shall ... bring a civil action ...” Section 402(b), 29 U.S.C. § 482 (b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “While courts have inherent power to enforce compliance with their lawful orders through civil contempt, courts need not impose the contempt sanction for every violation; courts should be particularly wary of imposing contempt sanctions for violations of an order that is ambiguous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “then a court should not postpone decision while the other ground is investigated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.