Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

593 F.2d 3

Docket Nos. 78-2102, 78-2508.

United States v. Denson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1979.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1979-03-30

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1980

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Denson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-03-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. A. “Tony” Canales, U.S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Brian K. Landsberg, Joel L. Selig, Dennis J. Dimsey, Drew S. Days, III, John E. Huerta, Appellate Sec., Civil Rights Div., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Robert C. Bennett, Houston, Tex., for Denson.

¶3Michael W. Ramsey, Houston, Tex., for Orlando.

¶4Michael A. Andrews, Houston, Tex., for Janish.

¶5E. W. Barnett, B. J. Bradshaw, Leroy Jeffers, Houston, Tex., Tom Mills, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for Nat’l Assn, of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., amici curiae.

¶6*4ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶7(Opinion February 5, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 588 F.2d 1112).

¶8Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GOD-BOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.

¶9BY THE COURT:

¶10A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶11IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/593/f2d/3 · .json · Public domain