Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 F.2d 314 - Kewanee Machinery Division Chromalloy American Corporation v. Local Union No International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers of America

Kewanee Machinery Division Chromalloy American Corporation v. Local Union No International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers of America’s Empirical Analysis

593 F.2d 314 · 1979

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Smith v. Hussmann Refrigerator Co. (1980), Super Tire Engineering Company v. Teamsters Local Union No. 676 (1983)

21 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

35019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Fletcher · General Drivers, Helpers and Truck Terminal Employees, Local No. 120 v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless it can be said with positive assurance that the contract is not susceptible of the arbitrator's interpretation.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On its face, the agreement before us contains two clauses governing the discharge of employees, one of which provides that discharges be only upon proper cause. Thus, an arbitrator could hold that [the Company] does not retain complete control over discharges. In so holding, the arbitrator’s award took its [es- • sence] from the collective bargaining agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Kewanee Machinery Division v. Local Union No. 21, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America, 593 F.2d 314 , 318 (8th Cir.1979), quoting International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Professional Hole Drilling, Inc., 574 F.2d 497 , 503 (10th Cir.1978). Thus,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.