Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 F.2d 565 - Marshall v. Emersons Ltd.

Marshall v. Emersons Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

593 F.2d 565 · 1979

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonis (1995), Chao v. Hotel Oasis, Inc. (2007)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

120197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richmond v. Arizona · Clifton D. Mayhew, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Dept. Of Labor, W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Dept. Of Labor v. Clifton D. Mayhew, Inc. · Brast v. Winding Gulf Colliery Co. · Richard v. Marriott Corp. · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Rickenbaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Case law is clear that 'a stipulation of counsel originally designed to expedite the trial should not be rigidly adhered to when it becomes apparent that it may inflict a manifest injustice upon one of the contracting parties.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in good faith and in conformity with and in reliance on any written administrative regulation, order, ruling, approval, or interpretation ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he general rule ... [is] that stipulations of attorneys made during a trial may not be disregarded or set aside at will....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.