Solien v. United Steelworkers of America’s Empirical Analysis
593 F.2d 82 · 1979
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably Asseo v. Pan American Grain Co. (1986), Burlington Northern Railroad v. Bair (1992)
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on NLRB v. Servette, Inc. · Schauffler ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Douds v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union Local 584 · Wilson v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union, Local 471 · Local Joint Board, Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union v. Sperry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“standard is satisfied where there is a reasonable basis upon which the NLRB would be able to sustain its charge before the Board. Even where the Director's legal theories are”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Louis v. Baldovin, Jr., Regional Director of Region 23 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants- Curtis L. MacK Regional Director of Region 10 of the National Labor Relations Board, Etc. v. International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Defendants · Baldovin v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n“It shall be an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents ... to threaten, coerce, or restrain any person engaged in commerce or in an industry affecting commerce, where in either case an object thereof is ... forcing or requiring any person ... to cease doing business with any other person, or forcing or requiring any other employer to recognize or bargain with a labor organization as the representative of his employees ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Board should consider the claims in question, and its determinations with respect to them will be subject to review here if any direct proceeding is commenced in this court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.