United States v. Terrell’s Empirical Analysis
593 F.3d 1084 · 2010
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Taylor v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Oregon's locational element is broader than the generic definition of burglary because it includes movable structures, such as boats and vehicles. Id. Nonetheless, we pointed to the risk of potential injury due to a face-to-face confrontation between the burglar and a third party, such as a bystander or police officer, despite the fact that an occupant of a building may not be present. Id. Second, we have established that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“)(citation omitted); United States v. Terrell , 593 F.3d 1084 , 1091 (9th Cir. 2010) (applying the categorical and modified categorical approaches”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a burglar's entry into movable buildings typically involves, much like generic burglary, ... purposeful, violent, and aggressive conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.