United States v. Eubanks’s Empirical Analysis
593 F.3d 645 · 2010
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Osborne · United States v. Nelson · United States v. Abbas · United States v. Doubet · United States v. Palmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sentence for the armed robbery offenses was to run 'concurrent' mean[s] that the sentence for the armed robbery offenses was a different offense from the revocation of probation/theft of the firearm sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he district court correctly computed [the armed robbery] offense separate from the revocation offense for the purpose of criminal history points.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.