Chae v. SLM Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
593 F.3d 936 · 2010
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (Consumer Home Mortgage Assistance Act of 1974) · 20 U.S.C. § 1071 · 20 U.S.C. § 1074 · 20 U.S.C. § 1078 · 20 U.S.C. § 1078 · 20 U.S.C. § 1078 · 20 U.S.C. § 1078 · 20 U.S.C. § 1082
Relies on Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Hines v. Davidowitz · Auer v. Robbins · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Congress enacts a statute that explicitly preempts state law; (2) state law actually conflicts with federal law; or (3) federal law occupies a legislative field to such an extent that it is reasonable to conclude that Congress left no room for state regulation in that field.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“consumer protection laws have traditionally been in state law enforcement hands.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress intended uniformity within the [FFELP]. The statutory design, its detailed provisions for the FFELP's operation, and its focus on the relationship between borrowers and lenders persuade us that Congress intended to subject FFELP participants to uniform federal law and regulations.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.