Mcdermott v. Ampersand Publishing, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
593 F.3d 950 · 2010
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 153 (§ 3 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 157 (§ 7 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Hecht Co. v. Bowles · First National Bank of Boston v. X Bellotti · Laird v. Tatum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish [ (1) ] that he is likely to succeed on the merits, [ (2) ] that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, [ (3) ] that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and [ (4) ] that an injunction is in the public interest.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. Restore journalism ethics to the Santa Barbara News-Press: implement and maintain a clear separation between the opinion/business side of the paper and the news-gathering side. 2. Invite back the six newsroom editors who recently resigned.... 3. Negotiate a contract with the newsroom employees governing our hours, wages, benefits and working conditions. 4. Recognize the [union] as our exclusive bargaining representative.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an interim order ... [was unlikely to] provide any genuine reassurance to employees beyond that provided by a final Board order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.