593 F. Supp. 981 - Comshare, Inc. v. Execucom Systems Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Weatherford Oil Tool Company v. Campbell · Fitzgerald v. Texaco, Inc. · Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. · Nicol v. Koscinski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Michigan has a greater interest in the application of its laws to the issue of enforceability of the contract, but only with respect to competition which occurs between Execucom and Comshare in Michi-gan____ [T]he parties’ express choice should not be overruled by Michigan’s tenuous interest, if any, in the extra-territorial application of its policy against contracts not to compete.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.