593 F. Supp. 2d 922 - Simpson v. Quarterman’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Atkins v. Virginia · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Griffith v. United States · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“responsibility,” "self-esteem,” "gullibility (likelihood of being tricked or manipulated),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Quarterman“borderline” subcategory of the classification of mentally retarded. The concept of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Quarterman“instrumental activities of daily living,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moore v. Quarterman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.