Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 So. 2d 109 - Wamble v. State

593 So. 2d 109 - Wamble v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2015

13 state decisions

70199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Butz v. Hein · United States v. Blum · 531 So. 2d 697 - Robinette v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A finding of probable cause may be based completely on hearsay evidence , `provided that there is a substantial basis for believing the evidence under the totality of the circumstances.' Rule 3.9(b), Ala.R.Crim.P. `An issuing judge's determination that sufficient probable cause existed to support the warrant”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"When reviewing a lower court's decision to issue a search warrant, this Court looks to the totality of the information available to the issuing judge and does not restrict its review to the `four corners' of the affidavit. United States v. Character, 568 F.2d 442 (5th Cir.1978).... Even in cases where the affidavit on its face is insufficient to support a finding of probable cause, oral testimony may be presented to show that there was sufficient evidence disclosed to the issuing judge which would sustain his finding that probable cause existed at the time the warrant was issued."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “restrict [our] review to the 'four corners' of the affidavit. United States v. Character , 568 F.2d 442 (5th Cir. 1978).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.