593 So. 2d 145 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The results of blood seized only for medical purposes and not in furtherance of a criminal or accident investigation are generally admissible where the State shows that the ‘circumstances of the taking of the sample, the identification, maintenance, and transporting of it, and the testing itself are scientifically acceptable and reasonably expected to produce results which are accurate and reliable.’ Aycock v. Martinez, 432 So.2d 1274, 1277 (Ala.1983).””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jones v. City of Summerdale · 610 So. 2d 1206 - Russo v. State

2. “the State establishes a prima facie case, conflicting evidence presents a jury question, which is not subject to review on appeal. Willis v. State , 447 So.2d 199 , 201 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 647 So. 2d 67 - Rowell v. State

3. “drove through dense fog at speeds of between 75 and 88 miles per hour”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Allen v. State