¶1We review Herndon v. State, 591 So.2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because it certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
¶2The question certified is identical to and controlled by our opinion in State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319 (Fla.1991). The decision under review is quashed and remanded for further consideration in light of Hunter.
¶3It is so ordered.