Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 So. 2d 20 - Littlejohn v. State

593 So. 2d 20 - Littlejohn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Manning v. State (1998), Triplett v. State (1995)

25 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · McMann v. Richardson · Holloway v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Moreover, undivided loyalty of defense counsel is essential to the due process guarantee of the Fifth Amendment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[O]nce an actual conflict is demonstrated, a showing of specific prejudice is not necessary, ...' for `to hold otherwise would engage a reviewing court in unreliable and misguided speculation as to the amount of prejudice suffered by a particular defendant. An accused's constitutional right to effective representation of counsel is too precious to allow such imprecise calculations.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial judge is under a duty to advise the defendant of his right to separate, independent counsel. In order for a defendant effectively to waive his right to conflict-free counsel, the trial judge should affirmatively participate in the waiver decision by eliciting a statement in the narrative form from the defendant indicating that he fully understands the nature of the situation and has knowingly and intelligently made the decision to proceed with the challenged counsel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.