Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 So. 2d 206 - Johnson v. State

593 So. 2d 206 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 656 So. 2d 1253 - Harvey v. Dugger (1995), 904 So. 2d 400 - Johnson v. State (2005)

1 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

260199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Stafford v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he jury foreman was questioned about jury pollings during deliberations and the jury's understanding of the court's instructions. This testimony "essentially inheres in the verdict" as it relates what occurred in the jury room during the jury's deliberations. This Court has held that such juror testimony is inadmissible.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Devoney v. State · Reaves v. State
  2. “Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror is not competent to testify as to any matter which essentially inheres in the verdict or indictment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Devoney v. State · Reaves v. State
  3. “[A] verdict cannot be subsequently impeached by conduct which inheres in the verdict and relates to the jury's deliberations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Reaves v. State · Griffin v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.