Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

593 So. 2d 329

Reddick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 25, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-02-25

Relies on 399 So. 2d 1137 - Vey v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc. · Bridges v. State

Decided 1992-02-25

PER CURIAM.

¶1Michael Reddick appeals his conviction of burglary of a structure.* We conclude that the elements of the statute were satisfied and there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict on that count. See Knight v. State, 392 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla.3d DCA), review denied, 399 So.2d 1143 (Fla.1981).

¶2On point II of the appeal, the State confesses error. The sentence of 20 years each for two counts of burglary must be reduced to 10 years each, the maximum allowable under the habitual offender statute.

¶3Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

¶4 Reddick does not appeal his conviction on two other counts.

/593/so2d/329 · .json · Public domain