Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 554 So. 2d 1165 - Pisano v. State · 536 So. 2d 206 - Perez v. State · 577 So. 2d 956 - Kopko v. State · 582 So. 2d 1225 - State v. Pardo · 546 So. 2d 1068 - Wise v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“exclude successive hearsay witnesses whose testimony of prior consistent statements merely bolsters and adds credence to the child victim's testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.