Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 So. 2d 677 - State v. Esponge

593 So. 2d 677 - State v. Esponge’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · 572 So. 2d 1166 - State v. Greer · State v. Rankin · Money Shack, Inc. v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he ruling of the trial judge on an objection to a portion of his charge to the jury will not be disturbed unless the disputed portion, when considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, is shown to be both erroneous and prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.