Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 S.W.2d 702 - Talley v. State

Talley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Gainous v. State · High v. State · Currie v. State · Guillory v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Commanding counsel to file a brief within a specified period of time and if he fails to do so issue an order requiring counsel to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. 2. Report counsel to appropriate grievance committee. 3. Relieve the attorney and appoint an attorney who will act as an advocate. 4. Direct trial judge to see that the attorney receives no further appointments to represent indigents in his court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.