Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 S.W.2d 709 - Marini v. State

Marini v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Turner v. State (1991), Moore v. State (1999)

89 state decisions

5601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Martin v. State · Jackson v. State · Terry v. State · Cain v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [I]t is urged that reversible error was committed by allowing the prosecutor to state his belief that the evidence would show that a conversation with David Colerider led police to the recovery of ... the murder weapon in this case. The State did not attempt to introduce evidence of this transaction during trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. White v. State · Watts v. State
  2. ““Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to any statement which contains assertions of facts or circumstances that are found to be true and which conduce to establish the guilt of the accused, such as the finding of secreted or stolen property or the instrument with which he states the offense was committed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Miller v. State
  3. “3. The State’s attorney shall state to the jury the nature of the accusation and the facts which are expected to be proved by the State in support thereof. A preliminary statement of what the State expects to be proved is proper. No error has been shown ... (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. White v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.