Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Lucas · Ex Parte Mathis · Ex Parte Walters · Ex Parte Dawson · Ex Parte Sharpe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he essential elements of credit card abuse under Sec. 32.31(b)(1)(A) are (1) a person; (2) with intent to obtain property or services fraudulently; (3) presents or uses; (4) a credit card; (5) with knowledge that it has not been issued to him; and (6) with knowledge that it has not been used with the effective consent of the card holder.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Shannon v. State · Ortega v. State““(1) with intent to obtain property or service fraudulently, he presents or uses a credit card with knowledge .... ” (emphasis ours)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shannon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.