Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 S.W.2d 719 - Baker v. State

Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Lucas · Ex Parte Mathis · Ex Parte Walters · Ex Parte Dawson · Ex Parte Sharpe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he essential elements of credit card abuse under Sec. 32.31(b)(1)(A) are (1) a person; (2) with intent to obtain property or services fraudulently; (3) presents or uses; (4) a credit card; (5) with knowledge that it has not been issued to him; and (6) with knowledge that it has not been used with the effective consent of the card holder.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(1) with intent to obtain property or service fraudulently, he presents or uses a credit card with knowledge .... ” (emphasis ours)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.