Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 593 SW2D 857 - Parker v. Parker

Parker v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1998

7 state decisions

4019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knox v. Long · McElreath v. McElreath · Texas Osage Co-Op. Royalty Pool v. Kemper · Gard v. Gard · Rumpf v. Rumpf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “General demurrers shall not be used. Every defect, omission or fault in a pleading either of form or of substance, which is not specifically pointed out by exception in writing and brought to the attention of the judge in the trial court before the instruction or charge to the juiy or, in a non-jury case, before the judgment is signed, shall be deemed to have been waived by the party seeking reversal on such account; provided that this rule shall not apply as to any party against whom default judgment is rendered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.