Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 F.2d 4 - Campbell v. Reed

Campbell v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

594 F.2d 4 · 1979

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
10
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably 175 Ill. 2d 294 - People v. Pecoraro (1997), United States v. Griley (1987)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 10 states

25019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Mooney v. Holohan · Pyle v. State of Kansas · Leroy Boone v. E. L. Paderick, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[t]he jury's estimate of the truthfulness and reliability of a given witness may well be determinative of guilt or innocence.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Viewing the record as a whole we conclude that the jury’s verdict might have been different had it known the full extent of Miller’s motivation to testify against Campbell. As we observed in United States v. Sutton, 542 F. 2d 1239, 1243 (4th Cir. 1976), “here the prosecution allowed a false impression to be created at trial when the truth would have directly impugned the veracity of its key witness.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] tentative promise of leniency might be interpreted by a witness as contingent upon the nature of his testimony. Thus, there would be a greater incentive for the witness to try to make his testimony pleasing to the prosecutor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.