Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 F.3d 301 - King v. McMillan

King v. McMillan’s Empirical Analysis

594 F.3d 301 · 2010

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer · Felder v. Casey · United States v. Love · Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Department · Bryant v. Aiken Regional Medical Centers Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether there was a legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, to find for that party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]estimony from other employees describing their own experiences of harassment by the defendant is often relevant to a plaintiff's hostile work environment claim,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f reasonable minds could differ about the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.