Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 F.3d 8 - Miller v. Hersman

Miller v. Hersman’s Empirical Analysis

594 F.3d 8 · 2010

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
January 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 10 district ·

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Greene v. Dalton · Bowden v. United States · Arrington v. United States · Stewart v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “responsibility, when possible, to further investigate a personnel action in order to determine whether the action was discriminatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.