United States v. Levy’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2256
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Locascio · United States v. Sanchez · United States v. Castillo · 636 F. Supp. 828 - United States v. Dost
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“deciding whether to grant a motion for a new trial, 'the judge is not required to review the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution.' " United States v. Levy , 594 F.Supp.2d 427 , 435 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting United States v. Coriaty , No. 99-CR-1251, 2001 WL 1910843 , at (S.D.N.Y. July 16, 2001) ). Here, in view of the centrality of Tyrone's testimony to the Government's case, the Court is left with a "firm belief”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.