Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 P2D 780 - Slaughterback v. State

Slaughterback v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2026

5 state decisions

20197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 69 Okla. Crim. 397 - Spivey v. State · 5 Okla. Crim. 347 - Adams v. State · Brown v. State · Parrott v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 21 - Woody v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consent is not an element [of the Crime Against Nature], nor is the crime less of a crime if committed with a consenting person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.