In Re HW’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fowler v. Valencourt · 157 N.C. App. 513 - In Re Estes · In re Butts · 101 N.C. App. 550 - Matter of Isenhour · 110 N.C. App. 817 - Richard v. Michna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“incapable as the result of substance abuse, mental retardation, mental illness, organic brain syndrome, or any other similar cause or condition of providing for the proper care and supervision of the juvenile.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“in every case where substance abuse or some other cognitive limitation is alleged.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the petition specifically alleges dependency; and (2) the majority of the dependency allegations tend to show that a parent or guardian is incapable as the result of some debilitating condition listed in the statute of providing for the proper care and supervision of his or her child.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.