Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

594 So. 2d 1196

Harper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1992

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1992-01-17

Relies on Ex Parte Harper

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-01-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2016

1 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

¶2Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s holding in Ex parte Harper, 594 So.2d 1181 (Ala.1991), the issue of whether the appellant’s counsel was ineffective should be determined by the trial court. This cause is therefore remanded to the trial court so that it might make that determination. The findings of the trial court should be returned to this Court within 45 days of the date of this opinion.

¶3REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.
/594/so2d/1196 · .json · Public domain