Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 So. 2d 12 - McDavid v. State

594 So. 2d 12 - McDavid v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dutton v. Evans · United States v. Cintolo · 485 So. 2d 681 - West v. State · Summerville v. State · 492 So. 2d 562 - Graves v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “trial courts are given great discretion in permitting the use of such questions, and unless there has been a manifest abuse of discretion resulting in injury to the complaining party, we will not reverse the decision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Such evidence, if otherwise admissible, would not be inadmissible simply because it corroborated . . . [the] testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “relating, first-hand, relevant acts in [a] criminal offense,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.