Barfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

cited by 60 later decisions

states following

October 2012

most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably 660 So. 2d 269 - State v. Darrisaw (1995), 601 So. 2d 540 - Taylor v. State (1992)

60 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 504 So. 2d 392 - Williams v. State · 530 So. 2d 53 - State v. Jones · 554 So. 2d 506 - State v. Simpson · Williams v. State · 579 So. 2d 75 - In re Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases-No. 90-1

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“`increasingly serious criminal activity' is indicated when the current charge involves an increase in either the degree of crime or the sentence which may be imposed, when compared with the defendant's previous offenses.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Mills v. State · Isaac v. State
“Does the temporal proximity of crimes alone provide a valid reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines without a finding of a persistent pattern of criminal conduct?”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Cave v. State · 593 So. 2d 301 - Walker v. State
“temporal proximity alone does not constitute a clear and convincing reason to depart from the guidelines.” Id. 3 . In Barfield v. State, the supreme court limited the ways in which the state could show an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 15 So. 3d 697 - Shores v. State · 603 So. 2d 1270 - Bunney v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.