594 So. 2d 29 - Collins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State (1996), 684 So. 2d 625 - Hunter v. State (1996)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · 428 So. 2d 1361 - Pearson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will not warrant reversal if the jury was fully and fairly instructed by other instructions.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Coleman v. State · Cohen v. State“[A] court's authority "to entertain and proceed with a case." Bullock v. Roadway Express, Inc., 548 So.2d 1306, 1308 (Miss.1989). In reviewing a subject-matter jurisdiction challenge, this Court looks at the type of case by examining the nature of the controversy and the relief sought, assuming the allegations in the well-pleaded complaint are true. Hood v. Dept. of Wildlife Conservation, 571 So.2d 263, 266 (Miss.1990); see also Penrod Drilling Co. v. Bounds, 433 So.2d 916, 924-25 (Miss.1983) (Robertson, J., concurring).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Every person who shall maliciously or mischievously destroy, disfigure, or injure, or cause to be destroyed, disfigured, or injured, any property of another, either real or personal, shall be guilty of malicious mischief and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in a sum twofold the value of the property destroyed or of the damage done, or be imprisoned not exceeding twelve (12) months in the county jail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.