Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

594 So. 2d 521

Docket No. 91-CA-163.

STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza

STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT v. Alfred SCRAMUZZA, et al.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1992.

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1992-01-31

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2003

6 state decisions

Relies on State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development v. Scramuzza

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*522 Ronald J. Bertrand, Rayne, for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Thomas Lee, Harahan, Mack E. Barham, Robert E. Arceneaux, Barham & Markle, PLC, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

¶3Before FINK, J. Pro Tem., and KLIEBERT and BOWES, JJ.

¶4ELORA C. FINK, Judge Pro Tem.

¶5For the reason assigned this day in no. 91-CA-162, State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation & Development v. Scramuzza,594 So.2d 517 consolidated herewith, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded.

¶6APPEAL DISMISSED, CASE REMANDED.

/594/so2d/521 · .json · Public domain