Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 594 So. 2d 596 - Fox v. Smith

594 So. 2d 596 - Fox v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2017

15 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schloendorff v. Society of the New York Hospital · Canterbury v. Spence · Mohr v. Williams · 516 So. 2d 488 - Phillips by and Through Phillips v. Hull · Scott v. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he trial judge is to look solely to the testimony on behalf of the party against whom a directed verdict is requested. He will take such testimony as true along with all reasonable inferences which can be drawn from that testimony which is favorable to that party, and, if it could support a verdict for that party, the directed verdict should not be given.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a competent individual has a right to refuse to authorize a procedure, whether the refusal is grounded on doubt that the contemplated procedure will be successful, concern about probable risks or consequences, lack of confidence in the physician recommending the procedure, religious belief, or mere whim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “I recognize that, during the course of the operation, - unforeseen conditions may necessitate additional or different procedures than those set forth above. I, therefore, further authorize and request that the above named surgeon, his assistants or his designees perform such procedures as are, in his professional judgment, necessary and desirable, including but not limited to procedures involving pathology and radiology.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.