594 So. 2d 846 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 568 So. 2d 18 - Lucas v. State · 472 So. 2d 1350 - Williams v. State · 537 So. 2d 1094 - Kimble v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he trial court prevented the appellant's attorney from actually confronting the witness with her prior inconsistent statement. Thus, any failure of the appellant's attorney to lay the proper predicate was caused by the trial court's refusal to permit it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.