¶1We agree with appellants that the trial court erred in denying their motions to amend and for continuance. The manner in which this ease was set for trial violated both the letter and the spirit of Rule 1.440(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1991), concerning the method in which cases should be noticed and scheduled for trial. Cf. Ramos v. Menks, 509 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
594 So. 2d 869
Jackson v. Feit
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 11, 1992
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-03-11
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1999
2 state decisions
Relies on 509 So. 2d 1123 - Ramos v. Menks
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-03-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →